Edwin

I think we are digressing. Lets go back to the topic on "Democracy".

In summary, we have the following points:

• Democracy creates stability as people have an equal chance to elect a leader of their choice to lead them, thus allowing the majority to be satisfied.
• It is a choice of a system to maintain stability to a certain extent rather than having no system at all, which would cause more chaos.

And:

• However, the minority of the citizens would be unsatisfied, since there can only be one leader elected from many candidates, which is still significant enough to cause chaos.
• There are other systems available which might be more effective in maintaining stability in a society.

Therefore, I conclude that democracy might not be able to create stability in a society. Theoratically speaking, democracy gives a fair and equal chance to everybody in a society to vote for the leader which they think is the most ideal. However, the can only be one victor among the many candidates standing for election. This would therefore definitely cause tension among the people supporting the winning candidate and the people supporting the other candidates.